Post by stonecutter on Aug 20, 2013 20:43:34 GMT -7
Question for everyone.
What method does your professional use to cast?
Mine uses the Omega Scanner to scan my stump. This system has replaced the plaster cast method.
Since moving to this new system, my prosthetic device has never fit properly. I always bottom out on the tibula end. So much so that I have a callus there. I wear holes in my liners in about 8-10 months at the pressure point. When I go for adjustments, they grind away at that spot in the socket, however the problem returns fairly immediately. We've tried pads in the back of the socket to decrease movement as a result of grinding out the front, but it makes the prosthesis fit differently.
The difference in the texture of having socks slide down the fibreglass finished socket and leather or neoprene pad causes the bottom of the stump to twist a bit from front to back, changes the angle of the pin and makes it difficult to land in the pin lock...
I don't want to seem like I'm on a huge complaint here... but I feel we'd be getting better fits if we return back to the days of plaster. It left the interpretation of the socket in the hands of the very talented professional. As it sits with this scanner system - we have a device that bounces light off your stump, but doesn't necessarily allow for the little hard knobbies, bones and problem areas under the skin - it sees it all as the same thing.
I wonder if they even have plaster kicking around anymore? What would they say if I ask to go back to the plaster the next time I need a socket?
Thoughts?
What method does your professional use to cast?
Mine uses the Omega Scanner to scan my stump. This system has replaced the plaster cast method.
Since moving to this new system, my prosthetic device has never fit properly. I always bottom out on the tibula end. So much so that I have a callus there. I wear holes in my liners in about 8-10 months at the pressure point. When I go for adjustments, they grind away at that spot in the socket, however the problem returns fairly immediately. We've tried pads in the back of the socket to decrease movement as a result of grinding out the front, but it makes the prosthesis fit differently.
The difference in the texture of having socks slide down the fibreglass finished socket and leather or neoprene pad causes the bottom of the stump to twist a bit from front to back, changes the angle of the pin and makes it difficult to land in the pin lock...
I don't want to seem like I'm on a huge complaint here... but I feel we'd be getting better fits if we return back to the days of plaster. It left the interpretation of the socket in the hands of the very talented professional. As it sits with this scanner system - we have a device that bounces light off your stump, but doesn't necessarily allow for the little hard knobbies, bones and problem areas under the skin - it sees it all as the same thing.
I wonder if they even have plaster kicking around anymore? What would they say if I ask to go back to the plaster the next time I need a socket?
Thoughts?